WEBINAR ON CO-BENEFITS – HIGHLIGHTS AND SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION:

INSIGHTS FROM FSD AFRICA REPORT:

· Local Benefits Vary: Clean energy and cookstove projects deliver stronger economic and health outcomes than forest-only projects.

· Limited Job Creation: Projects create some jobs, but impact is often small and unevenly distributed.

· Revenue Sharing is Modest: Communities receive limited and delayed income, especially when costs are high.

· Gender & Equity Gaps: Women often excluded from benefits due to land and power imbalances.

· Health & Environmental Gains: Notable in projects like clean cookstoves and waste management.

· Design & Governance Matter: Community-led, well-structured projects deliver better results.

VIEW THE REPORT HERE

POLL QUESTION AND RESULTS:

· A poll asked participants to rank top co-benefits for African carbon projects: options included jobs, livelihoods, biodiversity, water, health, equity, or “all equally important.

· Results showed strong support for biodiversity, job creation, and “all equally important.

· Panelists agreed that prioritization is necessary due to limited resources and varying project types.

· Community voices must drive decisions—what communities value may differ from assumptions by outsiders.

· From a policy perspective, job creation and ecosystem health are often top priorities.

INSIGHTS FROM SPEAKERS:

· Carbon Tanzania shared how projects are supporting education, land rights, and cultural identity through direct community financing.

· Successful projects empower communities, protect local rights, and build trust through benefit-sharing.

· Co-benefits must be measurable (e.g., SDG impact, biodiversity richness) and locally relevant.

· Nature-based carbon markets can fund long-term conservation if supported by:

o Strong data infrastructure

o Good governance at community and national levels

o Smart, context-specific project design

o Long-term investment and planning (5–10 years+)

· Projects must balance community needs with conservation goals for sustainability.

· Carbon markets provide a sustainable, market-based alternative to traditional donor-funded conservation, linking nature protection to the global economy.

· Carbon markets assign value to standing forests and wildlife, creating incentives to conserve rather than exploit.

· Effective measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) systems are essential for transparency, trust, and market integrity.

· African countries need stronger regulations and institutions to support robust MRV systems.

· Successes in carbon markets should be highlighted to maintain momentum and confidence.

· Domestic carbon registries and African standards are being developed to enhance environmental and social integrity.

· Carbon markets can seem intangible and complex, causing skepticism; co-benefits like job creation help make projects more tangible and understandable.

· Success in delivering co-benefits depends on understanding local context, social systems, and community needs—not just fixed worldviews.

· Incentives like the Climate, Community, and Biodiversity (CCB) certification encourage developers to prioritize co-benefits by enabling higher credit prices.

· Governments need credible data on socioeconomic impacts to support incentives, policies, and benefit-sharing frameworks.

· Transparency, clear benefit-sharing (e.g., Tanzania’s 61% of carbon revenue to communities), and alignment with standards are crucial for project success and trust.

· African countries should unify their voice in international carbon market negotiations to protect their interests.

· The future of funding should look beyond carbon credits alone, elevating biodiversity, social, and economic benefits as standalone financial assets.

KEY TAKEAWAY:

· Community-centered project design, transparency, and long-term sustainability are essential for success.